Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

$
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch
stated on December 28, 2019 in a Facebook post:

 “More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested—Murder, Rape, DUI.”

Mostly False
By Miriam Valverde
January 14, 2020

Fact-checking a Facebook post on arrests of DACA applicants for murder, rape, DUI

If your time is short

  • More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested, but not for murder, rape, and DUI.
  • The most common arrests are for driving (excluding DUI) and immigration violations.
  • Immigrants deemed to pose a security threat, convicted of a felony, a significant misdemeanor, or three or more misdemeanors are not eligible for DACA.
See the sources for this fact-check

Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, is portraying Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals as an “Obama-era amnesty for adults” that jeopardizes the safety of Americans.

In a Facebook post, the group uses a black-and-white image of the border streaked in red with the following text: “More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested — Murder, Rape, DUI.”

A caption for the graphic cites an “alarming” government report as its source.

The Judicial Watch post has been viewed more than 600,000 times and was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

The post is misleading. While more than 100,000 people who applied for DACA had an arrest in their record, the bulk of those arrests were for driving offenses that exclude DUI, and for immigration-related offenses. 

An arrest does not mean that the person was found guilty of a crime. Convicted felons and people who pose a threat to national security or public safety are not eligible for DACA, and neither are those convicted of a significant misdemeanor, or three or more misdemeanors.

Also, the 100,000-person figure includes applicants who were denied DACA or terminated from the program. The Judicial Watch post does not make that clear.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton defended the Facebook graphic in an email, saying the post “does not say or even suggest that all 100,000 referenced recipients were arrested for the three crimes,” as in murder, rape and DUI. He also said that “nowhere does Judicial Watch refer to the arrests as convictions.”

What the government numbers say and mean

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which handles DACA applications, in a November report said 118,371 immigrants who applied for DACA had an arrest or apprehension in their record. A recorded arrest does not prohibit someone from applying for DACA.

“Under long-standing DACA guidelines, not all convictions or arrests will necessarily result in a denial or termination, unless, as a matter of its discretion, USCIS determines that DACA is not warranted due to public safety, national security, or other discretionary factors on a case-by-case basis,” the agency said in its report.

An arrest is not the end of the story, the report notes. Applicants may not have been charged with a crime resulting from the arrest, may have had their charges reduced or dismissed entirely, or may have been acquitted of any charges.

The agency outlined two sets of data: applicants with prior arrests and approved for DACA, and applicants with prior arrests and denied or terminated from the program.

If immigration officials determined that an applicant had a felony conviction, met other disqualifying criteria or posed a security threat, federal guidelines say they should deny the application or revoke DACA status. The government data does not specify if the denials or terminations were related to the arrests.

screenshot offenses daca applicants
Figure 1: screenshot offenses daca applicants

Arrests for DUI, rape and murder represent a sliver of the full picture. And the data does not say anything about whether these applicants were convicted of the crimes, which would affect their eligibility for DACA. 

The most common arrests

The top arrest category was for “driving-related” offenses, such as speeding or driving without a valid license. (It does not include DUI.) More than 25,300 approved DACA applicants had a prior arrest in this category.

The second-most common category was for “immigration-related” offenses, such as overstaying a visa or an arrest related to deportation proceedings. (Nearly 13,000 approved DACA applicants had a prior arrest in this category.)

See a list of all the offenses and arrests here.

Our ruling

A Judicial Watch Facebook post said, “More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested — Murder, Rape, DUI.”

This is deceptive. More than 100,000 DACA applicants have been arrested, but not for murder, rape, and DUI. By emphasizing those crimes, the post gives the wrong impression. The post does not mention the most common arrests, which are for driving and immigration violations (not DUI).

Immigrants deemed to pose a security threat or who have a felony conviction are not eligible for DACA.

We rate the post Mostly False.

Our Sources

Facebook post Judicial Watch, Dec. 28, 2019

Email interview, Tom Fitton Judicial Watch president, Dec. 30, 2019

PolitiFact, Donald Trump says some DACA recipients are ‘very tough, hardened criminals.’ That’s False, Nov. 14, 2019

USCIS.gov, Immigration and Citizenship Data

Judicial Watch, More Than 100,000 DACA Applicants Have Been Arrested—Murder, Rape, DUI, Nov. 19, 2019

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Miriam Valverde
Mitt Romney
stated on August 29, 2021 a CNN interview
The Trump administration worked to free 5,000 Taliban prisoners.
True
Facebook posts
stated on August 16, 2021 a Facebook post
COVID-19 vaccinations are “a violation of the Nuremberg code."
False
Instagram posts
stated on June 4, 2021 an Instagram post
"920 women lose their unborn babies after getting vaccinated."
False
Facebook posts
stated on May 25, 2021 a Facebook post
“Biden agrees to Pelosi's request to resign.”
Pants on Fire!

Facebook post makes false claim about a lockdown, open borders

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
stated on January 7, 2026 a press briefing

stated on January 14, 2026 a statement

Social Media
stated on February 14, 2026 social media posts



stated on January 20, 2026 an op-ed


Donald Trump
stated on February 3, 2026 remarks in the Oval Office


Social Media
stated on February 8, 2026 social media posts





Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
stated on stated on November 17, 2025 in remarks at George Washington University:

Donald Trump
stated on February 2, 2026 an interview with Dan Bongino