Viral image
Viral image
stated on April 16, 2020 in a Facebook post:

“Pick up a product. Look at the barcode. If the first 3 numbers are 690 or 691 or 692, the product was made in China.”

Mostly False
By Madison Czopek
April 23, 2020

A barcode won’t tell you if a product was made in China

If your time is short

• A product’s barcode numbers don’t reveal its country of origin.

• Prefixes for product numbers are assigned to individual manufacturers based on a set of country codes, but the products could be made anywhere.

• These claims have been around since 2008 and have been debunked several times.

See the sources for this fact-check

As American businesses struggle to stay afloat amid shutdowns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, calls to buy American-made products have been growing on social media.

Also rearing its head online is anti-Asian and anti-Chinese sentiment, directed at the country where the novel coronavirus was first discovered

One viral image from Facebook reads: “Pick up a product. Look at the barcode. If the first 3 numbers are 690 or 691 or 692, the product was made in China. Put it down and buy from any other country.”

The post misrepresents what the numbers that accompany a barcode indicate; they do not tell consumers where a product was made. 

These claims appear to date back to a 2008 email chain, and they’ve been repeatedly dismissed as incorrect. The idea that barcodes indicate a product’s country of origin has been debunked through the years by outlets such as Snopes, Reuters, Lead Stories and Nationwide Barcode.

How barcodes work

Barcodes are found on nearly all consumer products worldwide.

The black and white barcode on a product package is an electronically scannable image that is accompanied by product number, usually printed just below it. This number, called a Global Trade Item Number, identifies what a product is and the owner of the brand that makes it. Although several variations of product numbers are used around the world, a 12- or 13-digit product number is common.

The Facebook post claims that the first two to three digits of a product number indicate a product’s country of origin. But this is not the case, according to GS1, the global nonprofit foundation that works with manufacturers to assign the unique product numbers used with barcodes.

These first few digits, called a prefix, are significant: GS1 licenses prefixes to manufacturers so they can create unique product numbers and barcodes that identify their particular company as the owner. These company prefixes are based on a set of country codes.

It’s true that 690 to 699 prefixes are assigned to GS1 China, but that doesn’t mean products with those prefixes are made there. GS1’s website notes that “since GS1 member companies can manufacture products anywhere in the world, GS1 prefixes do not identify the country of origin for a given product.”

Most products have written labels that indicate where they were made. For example, a box of anti-viral Kleenex tissues says, “Made in the USA from domestic and imported material.”

Nationwide Barcode, another outfit that sells EAN and UPC barcodes, confirms that the product number prefix does not indicate what country a product was made in.

“Whether you purchase a barcode prefix from the GS1 or purchase a barcode from a company like Nationwide Barcode, the barcode will indicate the country where the prefix originated, regardless of where that company has their products manufactured,” says a Nationwide Barcode article.

Our ruling

A viral image reads, “Pick up a product. Look at the barcode. If the first 3 numbers are 690 or 691 or 692, the product was made in China.”

The prefix of the number that accompanies a barcode does not indicate what country the product was manufactured in. While GS1 assigns prefixes to companies based on a set of country codes, those companies can manufacture their products anywhere in the world.

We rate this image Mostly False.

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Madison Czopek
Social Media
stated on January 20, 2026 posts on social media
Trees can explode if temperatures drop to 20 degrees below zero.
Mostly False
Donald Trump
stated on January 3, 2026 a post on Truth Social
Gov. Tim Walz had Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman killed.
False
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
stated on November 17, 2025 remarks at George Washington University
“We’re not cutting science. We’re not cutting research.”
Pants on Fire!
TikTok posts
stated on November 15, 2025 a post on TikTok
Video shows President Donald Trump patting President Bill Clinton’s crotch.
False
Donald Trump
stated on September 22, 2025 a press conference
“There's no downside” to avoiding Tylenol or acetaminophen use while pregnant.
Pants on Fire!
Benjamin Netanyahu
stated on July 27, 2025 remarks
“There is no starvation in Gaza.”
Pants on Fire!

Sen. Mike Lee’s evidence-free conspiracy theory that the MN shooter was a ‘Marxist’ is Pants on Fire

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
stated on January 7, 2026 a press briefing

stated on January 14, 2026 a statement

Social Media
stated on February 14, 2026 social media posts



stated on January 20, 2026 an op-ed


Donald Trump
stated on February 3, 2026 remarks in the Oval Office


Social Media
stated on February 8, 2026 social media posts





Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
stated on stated on November 17, 2025 in remarks at George Washington University:

Donald Trump
stated on February 2, 2026 an interview with Dan Bongino