Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

$

Ask PolitiFact: Why are millions of Americans not working but excluded from the ‘unemployed’ rate?

By Louis Jacobson
August 4, 2023
By Maria Briceño
August 4, 2023

If your time is short

  • The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics does not define people as “unemployed” unless they are actively looking for work.

  • In the bureau’s Employment Situation report for June, 5.4 million people did not qualify as unemployed because they were not actively looking for work. This includes students, retirees and people caring for family members. 

  • This unemployment definition is not unique to the Biden administration; it’s been used for official government statistics since the 1940s.

See the sources for this story

As he prepares to run for another term in office, President Joe Biden has been touting a strong economy that’s rebounding from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. But a PolitiFact reader wondered whether the administration is misleading Americans about unemployment data.

PolitiFact is now publishing fact-checks in Spanish, and in July launched a WhatsApp number readers can use to text fact-check ideas. A reader recently messaged us a link to an article on The Gateway Pundit, headlined: “Gov’t admits millions of unemployed people were not counted in latest job stats.”

The article on The Gateway Pundit site was written by The Western Journal, a conservative website. The article criticized a post by President Joe Biden on X, formerly Twitter, that boasts about a thriving economy. 

The Western Journal article accused Biden of leaving out important information, saying that a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report revealed “that more than five million Americans who are not working were not counted in the unemployment rate, which stands at 3.6 percent.”

The bureau in its Employment Situation report for June said the unemployment rate was 3.6%. Elsewhere in that report, the agency said that there are 5.4 million Americans who are not reflected in that rate, because they are not officially considered unemployed.

“The number of persons not in the labor force who currently want a job was 5.4 million in June, little changed from the prior month,” the report said. “These were not counted as unemployed because they were not actively looking for work during the 4 weeks preceding the survey or were unavailable to take a job.” (The bureau published its July data a few days after The Western Journal published its article.)

It isn’t unusual or new for presidents to omit from their comments people who are not actively looking for a job. The bureau has used this definition since the 1940s.

Where the data comes from

The bureau’s unemployment numbers come from the Current Population Survey, a monthly, nationwide assessment. It has been conducted, under essentially the same parameters, every month since 1940, according to the bureau.

The government agency considers people employed if they did any paid work at all during the week the survey covers. The agency classifies people as “unemployed” if they do not have a job, are ready to take a job and have actively looked for a job in the four weeks preceding the survey. 

Gary Burtless, economist and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, told PolitiFact that the bureau is not hiding these numbers.

“More than 5 million jobless workers who would like to find a job are not counted as ‘unemployed’ for a simple reason: They did not take any active steps to find a job in the four weeks preceding the labor market survey,” Burtless said. “Most other rich countries use the same or a very similar definition of who is ‘unemployed.’”

The bureau also publishes monthly “alternative measures of labor underutilization” basis. These “alternative measures” include people who are “discouraged workers” (who are not looking for a job because they are too pessimistic about their chances of finding one) and “marginally attached” workers, who have looked for work recently, but not within the past four weeks.

 

The measurements with the broader definitions will show higher levels of “unemployment” than the most widely used rate. Burtless said the bureau publishes this array of estimates every month so economists can draw their own conclusions.

The numbers of unemployed Americans not looking for work “frequently attract public commentary, especially when the official unemployment rate is particularly high,” Burtless said. 

But now, Burtless said, the standard unemployment rate “is near a peacetime low, a fact that is very hard to contradict.” And even the unemployment measurements that use the broader definition are low by historical standards. 

The “U-6” measure —  which uses the broadest definition of workers not currently employed, including those who are underemployed or have given up looking for work — was at 6.7% in July on a seasonally adjusted basis, compared with 3.5% for the standard rate the same month. Only during a few scattered months since the early 1990s has this measure been lower. (Seasonal adjustment is a statistical technique that tries to remove the influences of predictable seasonal patterns to show how employment and unemployment change from month to month.)

So, who are the people who are not working, but who aren’t “unemployed” by the bureau’s standards?

People going to school, retired or who have family responsibilities that keep them out of the labor force.

Our Sources

Post on X, July 29, 2023

The Western Journal, Gov't Admits Millions of Unemployed People Were Not Counted in Latest Job Stats, July 31, 2023

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, How the Government Measures Unemployment, accessed Aug 2, 2023

U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey Design and Methodology Technical Paper, accessed Aug. 2, 2023

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject, accessed Aug. 2, 2023

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Alternative Measures of Labor Underutilization, accessed Aug. 2, 2023U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- JUNE 2023, accessed Aug. 4, 2023

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION — JULY 2023, Aug. 4, 2023

Email interview with Gary Burtless, economist and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, Aug. 2, 202

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Louis Jacobson
Donald Trump
stated on May 4, 2026 a White House event:
“Consumer confidence is way up."
False
Donald Trump
stated on April 23, 2026 remarks at the White House:
“We are right now producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and Russia combined.”
Mostly True
Chris Wright
stated on April 19, 2026 an interview on CNN's "State of the Union":
Solar and wind have not reached “3% of global energy.”
Half-True
Donald Trump
stated on April 15, 2026 an interview with Fox Business News:
“Thom Tillis is no longer a senator.”
False
Byron Donalds
stated on April 12, 2026 an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press":
The U.S. Navy was created "to free international waters from the Barbary pirates."
Mostly True
Seth Moulton
stated on March 24, 2026 an interview on MS NOW:
"Bombing civilian power infrastructure is a war crime.”
Mostly True
Donald Trump
stated on March 29, 2026 remarks aboard Air Force One:
“We've had regime change.”
Mostly False
Donald Trump
stated on March 27, 2026 a speech to a Saudi investment conference:
“More Americans are working today than at any time in the history of our country.”
Half-True
Chris Wright
stated on March 12, 2026 an interview with Fox News:
The U.S. produces “more oil than we can consume. We’re a net oil exporter.”
Half-True
Donald Trump
stated on March 9, 2026 a press conference:
Iran “also has some Tomahawks.”
False

Ask PolitiFact: Why are millions of Americans not working but excluded from the ‘unemployed’ rate?





Donald Trump
stated on May 4, 2026 a White House event:








Donald Trump
stated on April 23, 2026 remarks at the White House:







Chris Wright
stated on April 19, 2026 an interview on CNN's "State of the Union":