The food pyramid was phased out in 2011, but it still gets hate. We looked back at why

Maybe it was a faded poster in your school cafeteria or a worksheet in health class, but if you attended school in the 1990s or 2000s, you’re almost certainly familiar with the food pyramid. 

The graphic dominated U.S. dietary education until 2011, when the federal government replaced it with MyPlate, which emphasized fruits and veggies as making up roughly half of a healthy diet. 

Today, health leaders and some influencers are still lashing out at the old pyramid, with its grain-heavy focus, blaming it for some Americans’ poor health. As Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced December plans to unveil new federal dietary guidelines, we looked back at the old food pyramid. Was it really that bad? And did it actually change how we eat?

And what do experts (who aren’t trying to sell you something) say is a “healthy, balanced diet,” anyway? 

Old, but not as old as the pyramids in Egypt

The iconic food pyramid didn’t make its debut in the U.S. until 1992, but its triangular building blocks date back further.  

U.S. Department of Agriculture, “The Basic Seven,” 1943 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture published its first dietary guidance in 1894 as a “Farmers’ Bulletin.” Over the next 80 years, as nutrition and food science understanding evolved, the department issued new guidelines on how to eat. In 1933, guidance advised families on how to get nutrients on a Depression-era budget. In 1943, the USDA’s “Basic Seven” food groups focused on healthy eating during wartime rationing. In 1956, USDA simplified its guidance to the “Basic Four” food groups. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture, “The Basic Four,” 1956 

Up until the mid-20th century, nutrition guidance focused on vitamin deficiencies and making sure Americans got enough of certain foods. But as chronic health problems like obesity and cardiovascular disease began to rise in the 1950s and ‘60s, so did concerns about the American menu

In 1980, the USDA and HHS released the first set of dietary guidelines, which the USDA now publishes every five years. The food pyramid and MyPlate are simple, visual representations of these 100-plus-page guidelines over the years. 

The dietary guidelines of the 1980s and 1990s focused heavily on reducing fats and cholesterol and eating more carbohydrates such as rice, corn and wheat. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Food Wheel,” 1984

“Carbohydrates are especially helpful in weight-reduction diets because, ounce for ounce, they contain about half as many calories as fats do,” read the 1985 dietary guide.

Fats, sugars and oils appeared at the 1992 Food Guide Pyramid’s top “use sparingly” category, and grains formed the base with a recommended six to 11 daily servings. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Food Guide Pyramid,” 1992 

“The pyramid wasn’t ‘bad,’ but it reflected the nutrition science of its time,” said Debbie Petitpain, registered dietician and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics spokesperson. 

The thinking at the time was that low-fat diets were protective against heart disease, and carbohydrates were a healthier alternative to fatty foods. “It turned out that was wrong,” said Marlene Schwartz, University of Connecticut food policy and health professor. 

Research around the turn of the century revealed the reality was more complicated. Added sugars and refined grains also contribute to cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, and not all fats are equally bad for us. “Unsaturated fats from foods like olives, nuts, and seeds can be protective for heart health,” Petitpain said.

Reflecting this shift, the 2005 dietary guidelines ditched the grain-heavy focus in favor of a more even breakdown across the food groups. For a 2,000-calorie diet, federal guidance recommended six ounces of grains (half of them whole grains), two and a half cups of vegetables, two cups of fruits, five and a half ounces of lean meat or beans and three cups of milk. 

The USDA ditched the pyramid’s hierarchical sections in favor of vertical colored stripes and added a person walking up the side to represent physical activity. The visual was confusing and hard to parse.